.@sfbos and @LondonBreed’s office current arguing over whether to make substantial changes to housing approval process to get more affordable units for less money. Supes want to keep the old, unpredictable, more expensive process, of course.https://twitter.com/_fruchtose/status/1149370662886109184 …
-
-
If you wanted to buy her third house off of her at the $1.8M price she listed it for sale at last month, you would need to earn at least $28,770 a month to spend no more than 30% of your income on housing, assuming 20% down. https://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Francisco/273-Dolores-St-94103/home/955138 …pic.twitter.com/LdRREsyG77
Show this thread -
If she closes at that price or higher, her real estate investment would have appreciated by more than what 90% of Americans earn in a year for every single year she owned it.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it's gonna take an earthquake San Francisco is the sworn enemy of city planning since 1906
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"We have to ask ourselves 'who are we leaving behind?'" That's the attitude that's resulted in us leaving behind everybody but the very wealthiest
-
I should write a Medium post about this clip, shouldn’t I?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I thought it was about building as much affordable housing for working class people as soon as humanly possible. All this talk about 'ideology' is useless. We have a few hundred units of affordable housing in D10 over 10 years vs 1000's of market rate units in D10 - so what?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
