my 2015 experience with SFBARF centered around them campaigning for my then-supe, Julie "Evictions Are Exaggerated" Christensen, and me going to work for the dude who tried to fight the Ellis eviction of an HIV-positive vet near me. wasn't as familiar with their other work then
-
-
Replying to @uhshanti @IDoTheThinking and
in other words I pretty much couldn't stand them the moment they were founded/set foot in my dense, renter-heavy neighborhood, and am the wrong person to ask
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @uhshanti @IDoTheThinking and
I still think
@SFCityAttorney should bring CEQA lawsuits over suburban tech campus expansions in towns that don’t build housing and would get a bunch of $$ for transit and affordable housing from these companies. It would work.2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @natogreen @uhshanti and
If that's the case, Oakland should sue SF!
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @uhshanti and
Well
@MattHaneySF is trying to update the jobs-housing linkage fee to solve this problem. So maybe support that? As it is, I believe SF and Oakland do most of the housing construction in the Bay, so I’m not sure why you’d focus on SF instead of the entire two counties south.3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @natogreen @kimmaicutler and
𝔇𝔞𝔯𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔩 🍫 𝔒𝔴𝔢𝔫𝔰 Retweeted 𝔇𝔞𝔯𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔩 🍫 𝔒𝔴𝔢𝔫𝔰
Well heres the data from MTC and i the housing production as only gotten slower in SF after 2016, and then add onto this the SOMA plan that uses Oakland as a bedroom community. SF produces more than peers but it induces far more than Lafayette doeshttps://twitter.com/IDoTheThinking/status/1126961571819692032?s=19 …
𝔇𝔞𝔯𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔩 🍫 𝔒𝔴𝔢𝔫𝔰 added,
𝔇𝔞𝔯𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔩 🍫 𝔒𝔴𝔢𝔫𝔰 @IDoTheThinkingIn reality, the higher-end grows larger in SF because the pool itself of housing seekers in SF with higher incomes is substantially larger relative to the amount of homes produced. This is a fancy way of saying jobs/housing ratio. The capacity is capped, people are traded pic.twitter.com/a2PZ1mNNB2Show this thread4 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @IDoTheThinking @natogreen and
Yep, SF was worse than good old Santa Clara County on that jobs-housing ratio....
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @natogreen and
:/ and up goes everyones rent in the East Bay
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @IDoTheThinking @kimmaicutler and
Tbh i dont even blame this on the progs, its fairly bipartisan. Progs make it really difficult to build housing for commerical development mods attract and then the bad bipartisan soma plan is unanimously passed
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
The commercial development is needed to pay for all the programs everyone wants + liabilities.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @IDoTheThinking and
Yeah, I think it’s fair to blame both progs and mods. The city revenue/services math currently pencils out only if there’s significantly more jobs than housing. That’s the story of the whole Bay Area (and why we need state/local tax reform alongside building lots of housing).
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.