from an ideological standpoint, "build for the rich people first and throw a couple peanuts to everyone else" is not in my mind a morally justifiable plan, nor will the outcome be anything near as equitable racially or economically as the people advocating for it seem to think.
It again is still largely financed at a federal level. Ask @sea_Baugruppe
-
-
Vienna's social housing funding is almost exclusively from federal sources and largely has been since WW2. today it's funded by a 1% tax on income that funds the majority of social housing funds for development and rehab. they build high quality social hsg for ~1/4th cost of SFO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean, come on. Look at these subsidy gap rates. $350K at low income. $500K+ at middle income per unit? .... are you going to crowd out all other public service programs to finance this?pic.twitter.com/HEZHNSFYgj
-
if your point is (as it previously was) that social housing can't work because Vienna required low land prices after WWI, that's false-- the program was nascent between the wars, & the bulk of the housing was built after WWII, & much of it in the 60s & 70s, & on into the 200s
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.