this is assuming housing submarkets don't exist and that rents aren't sticky, which as any developer who has to send 30-year projections back to their investors will tell you, it is. housing doesn't work like toothbrushes, it is (unfortunately) an asset market.
No it’s not. The programs you often reference are also postwar programs executed at the federal level.
-
-
when you say the success of vienna relied only on crashed land values, and use that as an example of why social housing cannot otherwise work, you are dishonestly ignoring numerous counterexamples. you were not then, and are not usually, counterposing "municipal" vs. "federal"
-
you have often used it as a blanket example for necessary preconditions for the success of social housing. it is not an appropriate example of that, unless you take it entirely in a vacuum. it's motivated reasoning
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.