Watching housing twitter discuss dueling affordable housing measures is your daily reminder that urbanists’ political priority is attacking progressives. Winning housing policy is bonus at best for them. The Mayor’s camp isn’t going about it like they want to pass legislation.
-
-
Replying to @natogreen
I think the key thing, and key difference to the different proposals, it the Mayor’s eliminating DRs for projects. It would make hearings like today’s for Seawall Lot 330 go away (which is good imo!).
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @coreysmith_17 @natogreen
Today’s hearing is a CEQA appeal on a shelter. It wouldn’t go away if the charter amendment passed.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Making things non-discretionary (as the charter amendment does) takes them out of CEQA
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
The charter amendment does eliminate CEQA review or CEQA appeals. That’s inaccurate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The charter amendment does not remove CEQA or CEQA appeals for shelters but it does for 100% subsidized affordable and teacher housing. https://sfmayor.org/article/mayor-london-breed-introduces-charter-amendment-build-affordable-and-teacher-housing …pic.twitter.com/9jXO3hw44d
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
I mean, you could pass a CA and have it include shelters. But no, that’s not what your proposal is.... 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.