-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 4 more replies
-
-
-
Unlike SB50, Warren's housing plan is logically coherent and should be supported. Housing is a financial asset and Warren's plan recognizes that it will take public investment in housing to materially increase the total stock of affordable housing.
-
One tremendous tool for counter balancing investment demand for housing is the Swedish Nonprofit Housing Cooperative model. I am not aware if anything like that exists in the United States.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sincere comment/?: While substantively important, as a political strategy, is this more effective in primaries vs the general election? The high-cost metros where the *relative* cost of living increased sharply are concentrated in "blue" voting areas.https://twitter.com/FactChecker23/status/1134193447550631936?s=09 …
-
the housing crises in other parts of the country look a bit different from ours, but they’re there
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't see extra grants that are conditioned on zoning reform spurring nearly enough zoning reform. AKA, not good enough, not by a long shot. Not after
@GavinNewsom especially. Her plans for subsidy are good, if she can implement. -
agree, those grants seem like a sidenote as nod to land-use reform, and as with many grant/incentive approaches, may be least likely used where most needed - ie, wealthy places need not and likely often won't apply for the grants. c/
@heyanmarie
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let me rephrase. Elizabeth Warren's zoning reform are all carrots. No sticks. NIMBYs needed to be beaten with a big stick.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or we could nominate Warren! :-)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.