Remember that unlike San Jose and Oakland, SF doesn't have to spend 20% of its general fund on retirements for people who no longer work there because it has so many business HQs to generate tax revenue to offset pension liabilities and it's also a city-county.https://twitter.com/hknightsf/status/1134563915621265408 …
No, not at all. We just have to be aware of their costs and that they’re a major reason Californian cities and the state can’t expand services meaningfully right now.
-
-
Right so the question is do they disappear as a perk of public employment the way they largely have in the private sector
-
I mean, I don’t think they should’ve become a perk in the private sector either.... I have no idea how our generation is going to retire.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.