Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
kimmaicutler's profile
Kim-Mai Cutler
Kim-Mai Cutler
Kim-Mai Cutler
Verified account
@kimmaicutler

Tweets

Kim-Mai CutlerVerified account

@kimmaicutler

Partner at @initialized. Previously @techcrunch. When life hands me lemons, I make tarte au citron.

San Francisco
medium.com/initialized-ca…
Joined April 2008

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Matt Haney‏Verified account @MattHaneySF 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @kimmaicutler

      Are you referring to this law raising inclusionary housing requirements: https://hoodline.com/2017/07/city-sets-higher-affordable-housing-requirements-for-new-developments … It was an 11-0 vote. London Breed was the lead sponsor of the legislation, she’s quoted here saying it was a “consensus agreement”

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    2. Kim-Mai Cutler‏Verified account @kimmaicutler 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @MattHaneySF

      Because who was going to vote against something like that? It's like giving U.S. Congress control of interest rates and not expecting them to always have super low rates that juice the economy but create longer-term structural problems.

      3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
    3. Matt Haney‏Verified account @MattHaneySF 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @kimmaicutler

      I just wanted to clarify that everyone was for it, and that Supervisor Breed at the time was the lead sponsor, and called it a “major step today towards a more livable and diverse San Francisco for all income levels.”

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    4. Kim-Mai Cutler‏Verified account @kimmaicutler 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @MattHaneySF

      That vote actually lowered the rate from the 25% figure that your predecessor pulled out of thin air to sound good during her campaign.https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2017/05/18/sf-affordable-housing-compromise-development.html …

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    5. Kim-Mai Cutler‏Verified account @kimmaicutler 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @kimmaicutler @MattHaneySF

      She also frequently misled people that 40% was the new 30% when rates were actually cross-subsidized by more office, which aggravates jobs-housing balance: https://www.modernluxury.com/san-francisco/story/how-supervisor-kims-new-affordability-law-lets-developers-the-hook …

      1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes
    6. Kim-Mai Cutler‏Verified account @kimmaicutler 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @kimmaicutler @MattHaneySF

      From 2017 to 2018, inclusionary fees meant to fund affordable housing dropped by 50%. Guess what SF planning chief John Rahaim said? https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2017/07/10/sf-planning-chief-development-boom-housing-crisis.html …pic.twitter.com/jDhvyzYqc8

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    7. Matt Haney‏Verified account @MattHaneySF 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @kimmaicutler

      Have you brought this up with the ordinance’s lead sponsor? Is she for revisiting the law and lowering the inclusionary rates?

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    8. Kim-Mai Cutler‏Verified account @kimmaicutler 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @MattHaneySF

      I'm bringing it up with you. I think the politics/optics are really hard, for obvious reasons. It's a thing we signed ourselves up for and basically we're in a situation where things aren't going to move for awhile (and we'll still have a debilitating affordability crisis).

      2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
    9. Matt Haney‏Verified account @MattHaneySF 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @kimmaicutler

      I’m open to talking about the policy and looking at the data honestly. Ive been consistent about that. We need to build housing.

      2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
    10. Kim-Mai Cutler‏Verified account @kimmaicutler 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @MattHaneySF

      Kim-Mai Cutler Retweeted Kim-Mai Cutler

      I would look at this model and see if it's feasible in the U.S. Vancouver basically takes 75% of whatever the expected $$ increase in land value is when they upzone as a community contribution. But their approach means projects always pencil.https://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/1128480451604221958 …

      Kim-Mai Cutler added,

      Kim-Mai CutlerVerified account @kimmaicutler
      Replying to @kimmaicutler @MattHaneySF
      I might look at Vancouver's model where it's calculated as a percentage of how much the land value is expected to rise per project, so you get your percentage (whatever that may be) but the project always pencils. Ask @BrentToderian about it. Think they aim for 75% of land lift. pic.twitter.com/Q9fjiPgAem
      2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
      Kim-Mai Cutler‏Verified account @kimmaicutler 14 May 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @kimmaicutler @MattHaneySF

      Another weird thing to look at is if people keep complaining about construction costs, how is Oakland, which should have the same regional labor/construction costs and lower rents, shipping 6K units this year, which is more than SF has done in decades?https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2019/01/03/these-are-the-biggest-oakland-housing-projects.html …

      9:36 PM - 14 May 2019
      • 18 Likes
      • Jay Lee Roger Filmyer Prop 15 Polemicist 🇵🇷🇲🇽 Sunny ☀️ What-n-Tarnation 🤠🚂 Kieryn Darkwater 💙 Prop 15 Hunter (wants Tw*tter 2 ban Nazis) Oatman-Stanford Victoria "🌇" Fierce, Bus Rider, Prop 15 booster Alex Feerst
      1 reply 0 retweets 18 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Randy Shaw‏ @beyondchron 14 May 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @kimmaicutler @MattHaneySF

          When is the last time Oakland killed new housing because it would slightly shade a park in early evening?

          0 replies 0 retweets 19 likes
        3. This Tweet is unavailable.
        4. 2 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info