This sounded interesting until the third paragraph where it says “the ordinance outlines no formal punishment if a district does not build a qualified facility in 30 months.” ¯\_(ツ)_/¯https://twitter.com/TrishaThadani/status/1116501823857147904 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
honestly I’m just excited to see everyone be forced to vote on it
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @uhshanti @kimmaicutler
the freakout that ensues when someone even *ceremonially* supports a nav center in their district is worth it tbh
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @uhshanti @kimmaicutler
How low our standards have fallen. I want the forcing mechanism here to be a denial of trash pickup services. No Nav Center? No trash delivery for YOU!
5 replies 1 retweet 23 likes -
There is precedent, original Nav Center legislation, and the city did it: "Legislation would mandate The City to open up 3 additional Navigation Centers that serve up to 75 persons at a time within four months, and three additional ones within the year." https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/supervisor-urges-sf-to-open-more-navigation-centers-for-homeless-residents/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
how did they actually get them through?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.