Bloomberg made a graphic of @LeroyWesterling’s paper on how much California burns in two generations. The left is if we actually reverse course and cut emissions. The right is the current course. (Both are already much worse than today.) https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-03-01/california-s-wildfires-show-we-ll-all-pay-for-climate-change …pic.twitter.com/gz6Py2LSPz
-
-
On Average
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I call BS on that. Everything must burn, but that feels cumulative.
-
I think they’re using average annual area burned data that I contributed to the CalAdapt website. If you look at the scale, it’s not that much area on average in any year/point, but the percentage increase is substantial. 200-400% in Sierra Nevada. Substantial impact over time
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
