I assume we can’t have these toilets in SF because they’re not comfortable and private enough (which is why they survive). https://www.citylab.com/design/2012/01/why-portlands-public-toilets-succeeded-where-others-failed/1020/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Thoughts? These also seem 1/3 the cost of the relatively luxurious but easily destroyed SF toilets.
@kimmaicutler2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
Replying to @r2g2
we have to have attendants monitor them. Sometimes those attendants actually save lives (while adding more cost in terms of hourly operations).https://m.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/SF-Tenderloin-toilet-monitor-honored-for-12849230.php?t=c379f91694 …
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.