“Under Peskin’s proposal, many more small projects will require a conditional-use permit and go before the planning commission for debate. This dramatic increase in public hearings will amount to a denial-of-service attack on the planning department.https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Peskin-s-bill-is-San-Francisco-s-attempt-to-13618207.php …
-
-
Aaron Peskin is a living example of how human greed and selfishness often have no bounds.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Required activities must be fully funded. Where is the money coming from to pay for the added planning staff to promptly and professionally resolve the increased oversight? What new taxes/fees will be added or existing services cut to pay for it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since Peskin's bill includes a section that says the CU should only be granted if the property is not in a "Potential Historic District" I made a relevant map:pic.twitter.com/3Tk9UKksqz
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
aaron peskin for president
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.