Absolutely not one bit. But... when you say something like: the best investors I know and you list the qualities, I would think one pops into your mind. Mary Meeker. Or if you wanna go with a wife The Gotham Gal.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @spakhm
So let’s scratch that itch. No one attacked him. I didn’t. Arlan and Kim didn’t. They pointed out something that seemed... off. Or problematic. Being a public int. means your ideas should be held up to the light and analyzed. Or do you believe they should be immune to criticism
0 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @spakhm
... naw my man. That’s not an attack. That’s... sighs, she’s just expressing how a lot of minority groups feel. She’s saying he got some blind spots. We all do. And there’s nothing wrong acknowledging them because you can’t see your own blind spots.
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
I feel like your question frames the problem in terms of how to make a powerful, wealthy person with a large audience feel more comfortable rather than seeing it from the POV of people who have little statistical chance of breaking into a clubby, insular industry trying to point
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @spakhm
So people shouldn’t critique him because that would make him uncomfortable? How do you distinguish between critique that is legitimate and critique that is not?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Just noting that we are currently in a very long conversation about what would or would not make Paul feel comfortable on the Internet so I don’t think fragile is an illegitimate critique.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.