He may have created the institution but his comments over the last year undermine his successors’ ability to market themselves as open and inclusive.
So people shouldn’t critique him because that would make him uncomfortable? How do you distinguish between critique that is legitimate and critique that is not?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Just noting that we are currently in a very long conversation about what would or would not make Paul feel comfortable on the Internet so I don’t think fragile is an illegitimate critique.
- 2 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.