I’m not saying it has to be the same boundaried system, I’m just saying SF breaking off and forming its own system may not actually be progressive from a regional or state point of view.
-
-
If the public has 2 pay for it 1 way or another, there's no difference if we bail out pg&e, form discrete MUDs, form a statewide utility, or whatev. We still debt finance against future revenues. If we're paying, we should pay in the most progressive way, & should own the system
-
The most progressive ways to fund California’s systems and services also happen to be the most unpredictable and most volatile.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Right. Ergo your Property Tax reform idea.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.