In 2008 Zuck was a media darling. In 2018 he was a media devil. Was this because he changed? No. It's because Facebook's growth made it more attackable. I'm not saying Facebook is perfect. Just that you can conclude nothing from the trend in articles attacking it.
-
-
Replying to @paulg
Sorry it’s just different when you run a 2 billion person network that can influence democratic elections or add to sectarian violence.
Sometimes you just got to put on your Big Boy pants and deal with the heat.8 replies 11 retweets 318 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
You seem to be saying the same thing I am – that Facebook's size brings more scrutiny – but with the addition of snark and emojis.
12 replies 0 retweets 41 likes -
Replying to @paulg
The constant sense of grievance for very powerful people you air on Twitter is over the top. Even Facebook internally takes this pretty seriously. They get annoyed at coverage but it also helps people internally justify their asks for more resources on these problems.
2 replies 0 retweets 57 likes
Everytime the NYT runs an unfavorable (or even sometimes misrepresentative story), people working on trust/safety get more headcount and leeway to do work in countries with nascent governance.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.