In 2008 Zuck was a media darling. In 2018 he was a media devil. Was this because he changed? No. It's because Facebook's growth made it more attackable. I'm not saying Facebook is perfect. Just that you can conclude nothing from the trend in articles attacking it.
-
-
Replying to @paulg
Sorry it’s just different when you run a 2 billion person network that can influence democratic elections or add to sectarian violence.
Sometimes you just got to put on your Big Boy pants and deal with the heat.8 replies 11 retweets 318 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
You seem to be saying the same thing I am – that Facebook's size brings more scrutiny – but with the addition of snark and emojis.
12 replies 0 retweets 41 likes -
Replying to @paulg @kimmaicutler
When you describe the incitement of genocide in Burma, for example, as "size brings more scrutiny" it sounds dismissive and condescending. I assume you're trying to defend FB and that's not your intent, but realize you're not helping.
1 reply 0 retweets 20 likes
The constant sense of grievance for very powerful people you air on Twitter is a little over the top. Even Facebook internally takes this pretty seriously. They get annoyed at coverage but it also helps people internally justify their asks for more resources on these problems.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.