Do you feel that your hypothetical premise, with no demonstrable evidence at the moment, might be seen as absurd given that we are in a government shutdown now, which is negatively affecting the ability of Native Americans to access food and medicine https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/01/us/native-american-government-shutdown.amp.html …
I was pointing out that your framing, in the current context where there are real communities being hurt right now — not by someone self-censoring to avoid new taboos, but breaking them — might be seen as absurd.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It’s not tangential. We have numerous powerful people claiming that they can’t say what they really believe without any quantitative evidence that people are more or less censored than before. And yet at the same time, we are putting people into power (across the spectrum) who
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
I don't think it's about violating social norms and being "censored" as much as feeding a larger and larger audience lowest common denominator content.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.