Maybe we've become more influential, but most of the problem here is another change that has happened simultaneously: the acceleration in the rate of new taboos.
-
-
How do we prove that that is true?
3 replies 0 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @paulg and
Today I have a megaphone to 40K people, which I didn’t have 5 years ago. That’s like going from a dinner party to speaking on-stage in front of thousands of people at Central Park. That means I need to speak with more care and precision, since anyone in the audience can now tell
2 replies 0 retweets 61 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @paulg and
When the audience size goes from ~dinner party to 40k ppl in a stadium, the burden of responsibility shifts from speaker to listener. If you don’t like what eg The Grateful Dead might have to say, don’t go to their concert
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @TrevMcKendrick and
and teams are ultimately funded by Silicon Valley, in turn influencing the kinds of tech and culture underpinning that tech that the world adopts later, some people might want to stay and talk about blind spots that he or the institution he built might have.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TrevMcKendrick @paulg and
I have a feeling he’s not bothered by the people who won’t talk to him.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TrevMcKendrick @paulg and
People who choose to opt out is a very different and also interesting conversation. Should communications platforms have better measures of anti-engagement to see if their platform is becoming prematurely hostile to certain groups? If people exercise free will to leave, is that a
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
form of silencing?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.