What "both sides" comparison are you referring to? What I'm seeing is the suggestion that PT would've been raked over the coals for doing what RH did, which is almost certainly true and not really any kind of equivocation
Is this, say, something that should be a crime like a campaign finance law crime or something else?
-
-
I honestly don't know. IMO, we have a fuzzy sense of how political argumentation and persuasion pre-election should work — one that doesn't include sock puppet orgs & bot nets — but we need to admit that we're broadly unprepared for the tech-enabled reality. Lots of convo needed
-
And yet, this is the only conversation happening, which is the point. This should be covered more broadly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.