Kim-Mai, spare a thought for the displaced Twin Peaks homeowner who was forced to accept a $3m buyout so someone could bulldoze their home and build a condo complex.
-
-
-
Forced??? Wouldn’t they have elected to sell?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Get him Kim-Mai
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I personally mounted a Howitzer on the roof of my single family home from which I protect my parking spot and of course the neighborhood from the scourge of more neighbors. City of Berkeley said it's cool.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's right up there with "Red lanes are gang colors!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"forced out by property taxes"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Protecting homes” to NIMBYs = giving neighbors quasi-property rights over adjacent homes...
@48hillsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't make me demolish my house. I'll do it I swear!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Basically in SF, never sell your house
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Once again, your hatred of successful people has totally blinded you to the fact that, in South LA for instance, homes/land is cheap. 50% of residents own their own homes. They will be gentrified into far off suburbs despite the fact that they’re most likely to use transit.
-
How does legalizing apartments force homeowners to leave the home they own?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.