We can't keep pushing Californians into the wildland-urban interface with our exclusionary zoning policies. It is risking people's lives and our planet.https://twitter.com/Scott_Wiener/status/1063490441025327104 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
I get where this is coming from, and don’t disagree, but are the wildlife communities inhabited by folks who were excluded from urban locales? Paradise’s population has been consistent for decades.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RickPaulas
some of these people seem like they moved there from the Bay Area....https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/14/us/wildfire-victims.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
I more mean that the pop of Paradise has stayed steady since at least 1990.pic.twitter.com/PgTsKcRqls
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RickPaulas
most Californian communities started controlling open space and housing unit growth in the 1970s and 1980s. I would guess that Paradise did the same, and is probably controlled & appreciating.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RickPaulas
this seems relevant. WUI is fastest type of land-use growth in the us between 1990 and 2010 http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2018/03/06/1718850115.full.pdf …
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
"Many people in the fire's path were low-income, elderly, and chose to live in the communities in part because it was more affordable than most of the rest of California."https://eu.redding.com/story/news/2018/11/17/camp-fire-evacuees-fema-homes-paradise-california/2032893002/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.