And then I think that reverberated into prog strategy. Matt, unlike Jane, seemed super careful about not being positioned as anti-housing.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @markasaurus and
And then, like I said, Prop. C was such a good campaign because they understood - in a way unlike previous prog campaigns and like what I've been saying all along - that the tech industry itself and the workers it brings are not a homogeneous entity.
1 reply 0 retweets 20 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @markasaurus @IDoTheThinking and
they literally held tech workers-for-Prop C rallies and then other kinds of rallies with like... medical professionals for Prop C etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @markasaurus and
Yes. It wasn’t a populist attack against the villain tech or ron Conway. It was straight forward, connected to larger goals shared across the community.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ValisJason @markasaurus and
the thing about Ron is people who know him know that he actually does a lot of stuff/fundraising for national Dem/prog infrastructure. So the caricature of him seems bizarre and off-base to people who know him.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @ValisJason and
the folks who opposed Prop. C, well... I'm not really sure what Dorsey actually does for progressive politics nationally, so
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @ValisJason and
He seems fond of not blocking Nazis...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArmandDoma @ValisJason and
the blocking Nazis question is really hard. See
@klonick's Harvard Review piece: https://harvardlawreview.org/2018/04/the-new-governors-the-people-rules-and-processes-governing-online-speech/ …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @ArmandDoma and
most American tech cos based their practices on American norms, laws around free speech, which don't have a really aggressive or forward looking legal consensus on hate speech. But journalists seem to want American tech cos to go way above what the current US body of law suggests
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Sundar's answer in the NYT last week, for example. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/business/sundar-pichai-google-corner-office.html … You're asking a giant private company to make decisions on something that the American people/body politic/voters really obviously have no consensus on.pic.twitter.com/tqdKVQx9e8
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.