No on C is strange, because in two prior elections, voters rejected additional funding for homelessness on D and J/K. Probably because they were drowned out by many other competing ballot priorities.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @daguilarcanabal and
Or maybe voters didn't want to pay for homelessness but they were happy to make other people pay for it.
3 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @khuey_ @kimmaicutler and
Half of Benioff’s ads were “THEY PAY FOR IT, NOT YOU”
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @daguilarcanabal @ArmandDoma and
*shrug* they got it done. I'm gonna reserve my criticism of the DA LEFT for prop 10.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @khuey_ @daguilarcanabal and
Also to go back to the top of the thread the a big reason YIMBYs cleaned up in the East Bay but not in SF was because of the quality of the opposition.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @khuey_ @daguilarcanabal and
If you lose to mind control ...
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @daguilarcanabal @khuey_ and
she, like, personally reached out to... everyone. She put her personal phone number out there!
9:53 PM - 13 Nov 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.