It will add $380m a year and double the $12k per person spent now. 60 pct of sf homeless are from out of state. This will only go up. Theres a reason @GavinNewsom and @LondonBreed are against it.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @markpinc @aprilaser and
@gavinnewsom has no position on it. 70% of people experiencing homelessness were housed in SF when they lost their housing. Of those, 55% were housed in the city for 10+ years. Of the remaining 30%, 2/3s are from California. Only 10% are from out of state. http://hsh.sfgov.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017-SF-Point-in-Time-Count-General-FINAL-6.21.17.pdf …2 replies 1 retweet 95 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @aprilaser and
what happens in 5 years when sf issue is something else like police or schools but we have to keep spending 800m on homeless?
5 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @markpinc @aprilaser and
dirty secret which I'm sure you already know. Someone's going to have to run another gross receipts tax reform measure in two years anyway, because it's not keeping pace with wind down of payroll tax, a shift you were a part of negotiating for.....
3 replies 1 retweet 45 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @markpinc and
Max Ghenis Retweeted Senator Scott Wiener
If C will only last 2 years, why isn't it a bond? That gets around Prop 13 as you agree on below, since it's paid from property taxes. My guess: Prop C politically ensures any gross receipts tax reform includes similar homelessness $,similarly to:https://twitter.com/Scott_Wiener/status/1051009939060215808?s=19 …
Max Ghenis added,
Senator Scott WienerVerified account @Scott_WienerReplying to @MaxGhenis @scottsjackson84 @aughtnomThe charter budget power probably overrides the intent stated in the measure regarding existing funding (though not the tax - that’s permanently dedicated), but as a political matter, it would be hard to deviate from the stated intent.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MaxGhenis @kimmaicutler and
(Also I think the authors like wealthy homeowners more than tech companies)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't think the authors care. I think that one group is easier to wrangle money out of at a municipal level than the other.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.