dirty secret which I'm sure you already know. Someone's going to have to run another gross receipts tax reform measure in two years anyway, because it's not keeping pace with wind down of payroll tax, a shift you were a part of negotiating for.....
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
To add to this: the “we spend so much per homless person” arg is nonsense - majority of budget is spent on housing and formerly homeless, to PREVENT homelessness
-
Also, SF is a city/county govt combined, so all hospital and jail spending would get lumped in w city spending whereas if you’re comparing us with another city on a per capita basis like LA or Seattle, they would prob only have the city spending not incl King or LA County, etc
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How do we reverse this?
-
@davidchiu, I think, is pursuing something about the "Jeff Bridges" property inheritance tax break next year. But then there's the@evolve_ca@CAcalls 2020 split roll measure, which is supported by@Scott_Wiener, who will try to address the land fiscalization issue w/ paired leg - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I like this one a bit more...https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2017/10/27/sf-one-market-paramount-office-prop-13.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you think of land owners as share holders, residents/businesses as users, gov as operator, it makes a lot more sense to tax the shareholder than the user. “Twitter” tax deal was marketing/act spend. All ultimately to benefit land owners.
-
*act = acquisition
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.