Very candid assessment of the facts of Prop C @OurHomeSF potential to deepen & build on existing SF work to combat homelessness & mental health crisis -plus challenge of opposition misinformation. Credit to @hknightsf for not letting go of this bone! #VOTEhttps://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/heatherknight/article/Puzzling-logic-in-arguments-against-tax-on-big-13337931.php …
-
-
I’m not sure your point in pitting affordable housing and homelessness against each other but to double down on your first stab in spite of its being incorrect. To be clear, 70% of ppl experiencing homelessness used to be housed here. It absolutely is about affordable housing.
-
Do you think that the city’s 6,000 permanent supportive housing units should be under a single homelessness department or do you think all BMRs, PSH, public housing units, etc should be under a single dept focused on affordable housing instead?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To be clear, this isn’t me just bashing Progs. Mods own Prop Q and a lot of other deeply problematic Sit/lie policies, but they did put J, K and D on the ballot.
-
No, it reads specifically as you bashing my boss. And I think you're factually incorrect. It's a stupid debate inasmuch as everyone in our office is putting weight behind
@OurHomeSF. Irrespective of who put it on the ballot, it's the right thing. This isn't a contest for credit. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.