Dude, we are literally just stepping up and compensating at the local level for what someone at the national level, who your original founder supported, did to federal tax policy late last year. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/18/business/economy/tax-housing.html …https://twitter.com/micsolana/status/1055889494602276865 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
sorry, legitimately confused - 1) are you blaming the sf homelessness crisis on trump 2) what does peter have to do with me or my opinion
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @micsolana
That’s why I said “original leader.” I know that other people also lead the firm these days. But yes national housing/real estate/social safety net policy are *deeply* interrelated with poverty that manifests in cities and other parts of the country.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
my question is not about peter being at the firm (he is). my question is how does peter’s support for a presidential candidate have anything to do with my opinion.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @micsolana @kimmaicutler
to your second point (trump is responsible for sf homelessness) - extremely agree to disagree
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @micsolana
You are completely misconstruing what I said. Federal housing, taxation and social safety net policy has a *lot* to do with visible poverty that manifests at the local and metro level. The consistent challenge of the last generation has been to convince voters that local govts
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
have to effectively tread water against what the federal government has taken away since the early 1980s. Every time the federal govt undermines anti-poverty policy, city and state govts are left holding the bag. Current admin is merely a continuation of this trend.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.