I appreciate the spirit of this but I don’t think it’s legally defensible in the long run in America particularly with the way the courts have tended toward an expansionist View of 1a. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/ …https://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/1029854853483229184?s=21 …
I'm mostly fearful of this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/30/us/politics/first-amendment-conservatives-supreme-court.html … Like that platforms could continue to do more and more above the 1A base and then have the opposite reaffirmed at the SC level.
-
-
Is that a real or grounded fear or am I just being paranoid?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.