Twitter's online speech norms were created and shaped by lawyers who were deeply knowledgeable of existing First Amendment case law in the U.S. It feels like journalists now want platforms to intentionally deviate from that: https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1598-1670_Online.pdf … https://twitter.com/TonyRomm/status/1029827909987520512 …
-
-
this is a powerful reason platforms should look to apply a human rights framework— not just on content but generally. balances a larger set of interests. offers greater moral legitimacy in global application bc not tied to statehood.
-
This is utterly unworkable given companies and their have physical presences in the locations they operate. Likewise they operate in the legal frameworks of those locations.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In the same way that policy makers in other countries are annoyed/frustrated by norms of gender equality, sexual orientation etc etc?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Traditionally the US has been winning these debates w EU because the Germany + UK defused any implementation of EU parliament initiatives such as Safe Harbour. Given Trump it seems now there's a real appetite in DE to break up US big tech in EU instead of playing the mediator.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.