Twitter's online speech norms were created and shaped by lawyers who were deeply knowledgeable of existing First Amendment case law in the U.S. It feels like journalists now want platforms to intentionally deviate from that: https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1598-1670_Online.pdf … https://twitter.com/TonyRomm/status/1029827909987520512 …
-
-
It's...complex. It was entirely in house for a very long time. That has benefits like the ones you describe, but it also has downsides - notably, longer turn-around-times for reports. The reality is that scale profoundly constrains what's possible.
-
I see stuff like the Reuters-Myanmar story today & it feels beyond inadequate that that didn't move up the urgency chain quickly, particularly the fact that there is no full-time employee doing govt relations/community moderation, etc. there. How does that get prioritized?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.