Twitter's online speech norms were created and shaped by lawyers who were deeply knowledgeable of existing First Amendment case law in the U.S. It feels like journalists now want platforms to intentionally deviate from that: https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1598-1670_Online.pdf … https://twitter.com/TonyRomm/status/1029827909987520512 …
-
-
Indeed, and in the conclusion says companies like Twitter “lie outside current First Amendment doctrine”. The paper is 73 pages to say what we already knew. It’s a good examination of current law but even it states that Twitter isn’t *currently* bound by it.
-
It could be litigated against for years and then you’d have to decide what is worth that time and capital and what precedent could be set (in your favor or against) for all Americans under judges that have been put in place by certain administrations.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.