This is a bizarre comment for a journalist to make. “No, please let an opaque, highly centralized core of a dozen people or so make consequential and long impactful decisions on the public discourse for us with little transparency or accountability.”https://twitter.com/KurtWagner8/status/1028081116341620736 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
He is saying something else that after all this time Twitter seems to have a very light grasp on what has become a real problem
1 reply 1 retweet 28 likes -
Replying to @karaswisher @kimmaicutler
I’m not saying Twitter shouldn’t be transparent. These kinds of decisions are just long past due, and it feels like asking the public to weigh in is just another way to kick this problem down the road. This should have happened years ago.
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @KurtWagner8 @karaswisher
Our free speech norms and laws have taken hundreds of years to evolve in this country. The premise that we could figure this out in 12 with an entirely new technology/paradigm for communications is absurd.
4 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @karaswisher
How long is an appropriate amount of time to allow Twitter to figure out what hate speech is?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @KurtWagner8 @karaswisher
Does America know what hate speech is? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/ …
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
I don’t think we’ve seen what’s in store yet.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.