If Bart owned land becomes housing, what is the solution for suburban bart riders for their parking needs? Many areas are not adequately serviced by bus lines. Just curious about the solutions put forth.
-
-
-
You can put housing on top of parking? There are building construction techniques that enable this reality.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
-
I was going on the San Jose extension per
@alonlevy's numbers:https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/01/why-its-so-expensive-to-build-urban-rail-in-the-us/551408/ … - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is that $780M number above ground or below ground? Livermore still has large swaths of land available to build on, but needs a BART stop or two...
-
yea that was 1.6 billion for 5 miles. but really the whole Dublin/Pleasanton line is a waste of money
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Jesus that's expensive
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a Great scheme BART backers created: collect an out-sized portion of sales tax from vibrant, dense SF, but use the money to build/maintain a suburban sprawl transit system. Another example of regressive taxes used for terrible land use policies. Sprawl developers uber alles!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Have you been seeing the posts about bike share companies in the U.S. and China going bankrupt?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Suburban communities arent the villains here. Go to Pleasant Hill or Walnut Creek
@SFBART and you'll see a lot of density and a lot of cranes. Go to 16th or 24th St and its 2 or at best 3 story development. SFH at Glen Park and Balboa Park. Same in Berkeley. -
psssst Berkeley is a suburb.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.