Good news for single-family homeowners in SF. Your neighborhood character will be protected & your home value will either continue appreciating at $300,000 per year or hold value during the inevitable crash. But if you're looking to stay long-term? Ya gotta go to the East Bay nowhttps://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/1004379162751012864 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
The East Bay is not an alternative to SF either for private homeowners or commercially. It's just as expensive as SF if not higher.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @FriscoSmoove @kimmaicutler
It's not just SF though. Prices are up regionally and the migration of tech north has consistently pushed up home prices. The SF market was flat just 5 years ago and all housing development project were put on pause. It's lit again now but prices are exorbitant.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @FriscoSmoove @kimmaicutler
Perhaps but this would put a burden on the city of SF and it's residents to manipulate regional market supply to support a regional housing strategy. I'm not sure that is sound or reasonable.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Kim-Mai Cutler Retweeted Selma Hepp
We're so far in the hole that we can barely run in place. There's only half as much inventory per year (including existing homes that are sold) across the Bay Area as there was before the 2008 crash.https://twitter.com/SelmaHepp/status/1003682640963121153 …
Kim-Mai Cutler added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.