The world of San Francisco’s YIMBYs.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @AlisonB916 @czernobro
Uh you do realize that with the rest of the city off limits to really any kind of development, all 5 of the city’s next major projects happen to be located around there?
1 reply 0 retweets 20 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @czernobro @AlisonB916
Is there definitive proof that there was a City Hall coverup or are you just making accusations? I definitely approve of and support CBloggy’s reporting though. We can also just do nothing & wait for Bayview homes to sell for median $2M in 10 years time. That’s also fine.
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Kim-Mai Cutler Retweeted SocketSite
Because the rest of the city is more or less preserved in amber, this is what the housing pipeline looks like. Go figure.https://twitter.com/socketsite/status/973663808227962881?s=21 …
Kim-Mai Cutler added,
0 replies 2 retweets 28 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @czernobro @AlisonB916
I was disagreeing with
@alisonb916 that this is the future that YIMBYs want. It’s not. Bayview has a lot of the development pipeline concentrated in it for the next 1-2 decades bc few other neighborhoods allow anything.2 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
this is just so bizarre to me. it also plays into the assumption people make about YIMBYs thinking if we just blow up zoning the housing crisis is all solved, donezo! yes exclusionary zoning has to go. but once again, you guys are missing the point in a big big way.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
We could upzone rich neighborhoods and protect poor and PoC ones. But just upzoning everything perpetuates what’s wrong now.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Convincing wealthy neighborhoods that it’s in their interest to allow more neighbors does take a lot of organizing!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.