If the city elects a more NIMBY board of supervisors and and a NIMBY mayor, what will probably perversely happy is that Big Tech will be better positioned to outcompete mid-size companies and the city will end up being structurally dependent on a smaller number of small corps
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
Do you know of a sectoral breakdown of specifically the city-county revenue? I buy that these are huge, but this is making me realize I don't have a strong grasp on the mechanics of this (cap gains, property, state and fed pass-down vs true local) and curious now to know more.
-
SF is a complicated situation because it's both city and county and has huge enterprise departments like SFO airport. cap gains & income go to state. Property/business to the city. Not sure about how county conflates it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's why changing how money flows into the political system is really the only thing that will change anything - both locally and nationally.
-
Even though
@jason is from tech, he’d be stellar. A person’s background says a lot
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Paying taxes is different from making campaign contributions
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Some industry has to generate enough revenue for the city and county’s $10B budget every year.