body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Kim “Crusher” Coleman

There was a bill today to prohibit the government from using eminent domain to take your property to use for recreation, entertainment, sports facility, or gymnasium. It FAILED. The government can now seize your property for RECREATION. This is unacceptable. #utpol #utleg

5:06 PM · Feb 20, 2020

Kim “Crusher” Coleman

Replying to

But don’t worry, there were plenty of SLC lobbyists who appeared thrilled at the prospect of taking your property to create entertainment venues. I guess the answer to a housing crisis is.....take away even MORE housing for concerts 🙄

1

2

@ChrisFishsnoop

Replying to

You word this as if the state passed a bill to take property for recreation. Did they???

1

Kim “Crusher” Coleman

Replying to

@ChrisFishsnoop

That’s the effect of this bill failing

1

1

Show replies

Show more replies