On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-allen-anti-circumcision-activists-20120812,0,2269752.story … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
-
-
Replying to @DrChaya
I suspect this whole circumcision discussion and the "bathroom bill" is a distraction thread for the Russian Troll farms. It's designed to divert focus off our goal of WOMEN'S RIGHTS: right to choose, childcare, equal pay, and paid maternity leave. Everything else is a sideshow
7 replies . 4 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @MerolaGeraldine @DrChaya
Interesting point. But the anti-circumcision foreskin fetishists are also very anti-science like the anti-vac'ers and climate change deniers. They refuse to acknowledge the medical/health benefits of a circumcised penis.
14 replies . 1 retweet 6 likes
𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙋 𝙍𝙐𝙄𝙉𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙐𝙎! - #i2 Retweeted Brian D. Earp
Please read this thread by a Yale/Oxford grad who specializes in medical ethics and come back later. Also, you being a *legitimate* circumcision fetishist should not be calling us "foreskin fetishists". You look ridiculous.https://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/1078529309478838272 …
𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙋 𝙍𝙐𝙄𝙉𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙐𝙎! - #i2 added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.



