Ugh
Gorsuch said there are strong arguments favoring the LGBT workers. But he wondered whether the justices should take into account “the massive social upheaval” that might follow a ruling in their favor. @shermancourt, @MattBarakat report. #SCOTUShttps://apnews.com/b67d54e0812e43db832e086806a3a2fd …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wtf does that even mean?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is this even a question for the court? Does the court rule by mob opinion?
-
RIGHT?!! Appalling that a justice on the supreme court lacks the integrity to make a decision based on the actual merits of the case instead of how it will go over on FOX & Friends
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What if they'd said that about civil rights? Women's vote? Gah
-
I’m sure they did.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You mean being human to every human being what a concept???
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who even cares if Christians get mad? Most large companies already have a non-discrimination policy. I really doubt there will be much social upheaval at all.
-
Gorsuch isn’t saying that in good faith. He knows there’d be 12 hours of homophobic Facebook memes and then they’d move on to attacking Kaepernick or whatever the next bigot outrage is.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.