Gorsuch needs to stay in his lane. His job is to interpret and protect rights under the constitution, not to prevent hypothetical social upheaval.
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
SCOTUS-sanctioned bigotry is certainly going to cause some upheaval.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
"But the bigots..." is not a reason for denying civil rights.
-
It’s like the 50s/60s on repeat.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Gosh, all of a sudden he’s not such a strict constitutionalist.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Gorsuch wasn't worried about the massive social upheaval following his appointment after the Republican Senate refused to vote on Garland!
-
Heaven forbid an African American President should put a judge on the SCOTUS...IS what they were REALLY thinking.

Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
That's alright. They didn't take into account "massive social upheaval" when they ruled on Citizens United.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
It would not be a social upheaval, it would be everyone going about their business as usual with no one having to think about someone's gender or who they sleep with having anything to do with it & being protected from discrimination under the law.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
He should compare that to the court upheaval that is going to happen if they don't.
-
Ding ding ding
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.