Very narrow scope. They cover 1 vector of attack but slashing creates issues + PoS issue of guaranteed control% centralization/time via staking and permissioned entry via coin control. They could have PoW-free solution by simulating burning energy/capital by PoBurn of Bitcoin
Oh god, this thing again. We've now not only moved away from not understanding what Nothing-at-stake actually is, to actually actively use it as the red herring for slashing. Is "we must slash" the new "vaccinations cause autism"?https://twitter.com/jadler0/status/1219760484800499718 …
-
-
-
Hugely under-considered is centralization incentive of slashing.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I’ll ask the same question I always ask: without slashing what incentivizes me to do the work of validation? Why wouldn’t I just parrot a neighbor? Is there a risk to that strategy?
-
FWIW: I believe there could be an answer and I’d love to hear it. I just haven’t heard one yet.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.