Still doesn't give us an answer to how to avoid this from happening again, mind you the toronto attack was apparently done by a guy who was upset he couldn't get laid so, How do we tie that in to National Security?
-
-
Replying to @kevinaube @x__JB_x and
The point is, even when individuals who commit these heinous acts have an ISIS flag in their car, /2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Caneshaker @kevinaube and
or something, they aren't threats to "national security" either. Realistically speaking.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Caneshaker @CBCAlerts
The logic I am seeing is ecall every event a national Security issue then? Murder/Suicides, Robberies gone bad, Upset Husband/Wife hitting their SO with a vehicle. And what do we do? How does calling it national security help?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kevinaube @CBCAlerts
We're talking past each other. The legal definition of terrorism doesn't mention "national security." But it's unevenly applied. In part, /2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
...section 83.01 of the Criminal Code[1] defines terrorism as an act committed "in whole or in part for a political, /3
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause" with the intention of intimidating the public " Seems to fit the Toronto driver.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
He's associated with Men's Rights and the "incel" movement, talked on FB about a "rebellion." Political as hell. Terrorist.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Caneshaker @CBCAlerts
lol man, you shake that cane way faster then I can reply, props to you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'll give you that, The national security conversation was from earlier before the confirmation of the Incel story. I'll agree that yeah, it should be called terrorism now with what is coming out about this guy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
