Strzok interviewed HRod with her *nine* lawyers in the room. Strzok interviewed Flynn without the benefit of counsel and didn't even tell him it was an interview.https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1072696960493281281 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In otherwords wanted to keep it an informal meeting instead of stating this is an interview and anything you say will be used against you later.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Do he was told he could have a lawyer, but chose not too?
-
Was instead told it wasnt necessary. Basically said if others were involved then the DOJ would need to be involved. Made Flynn feel like it would escalate instead of some general questions.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What’s your point? General Flynn offered that he needed no additional participants.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your gripe is that McCabe used the word "conversation" rather than "interview" and offered Flynn the benefit of having a lawyer present but Flynn declined? Wow, scandal of the century; you blew this wide open, bud.
-
There is no “offer”. There is only “if you bring a lawyer we’ll bring the DOJ” that is a threat. Total coercion.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is a bald-faced lie. Source: Mike Flynn's stenencing memo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If this isn't entrapment then I think no-one knows what entrapment is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This document completely contradicts your first tweet. He was explicitly offered the assistance of counsel and it's very clear he's being interviewed. What do you think a "conversation" w/ FBI agents about a crime means?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.