The point about not being allowed to have an account if 13 or less & the fact that it’s parents’ responsibilities don’t really work against “the content is also viewed by kids that shouldn’t be watching” ... I mean YT removed salt and ice challenges for being DANGEROUS content...
-
-
I don’t think that the salt and ice challenge is dangerous if you have more than 1 brain cell and at the age of 13 or above ... but yeah. The removed vid also had a disclaimer to not try at home if that means anything these days lol
4 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @bodil40 @TeamYouTube
You realize the same content applies to people blowing each other's brains out in video games/anime, but all that content gets away fine. You know why? Because it's a video game/cartoon/anime. It's not real. Kids know what is and isn't real.
4 replies 2 retweets 100 likes -
Replying to @Lost_Pause_ @TeamYouTube
Lol, if you actualy believe that. Also overly sexualized games do get striked sometimes. There were issues with some other games rated M as well ... I do get it’s not fair to get a strike for something that’s all over youtube but you should be able to see the other POV lmao
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Same goes for a lot of the try not to laugh anime vines etc. there’s a loooot of fucked up and they’re still on youtube, yt’s just slowly becoming more and more strict about shit.... Try to get the strike re-reviewed, they usually end up removing them but I think that a year 2/3
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
From now you wouldn’t be able to be playing dating sims and visual novels if they have ... big ... artstyle ... Same thing happened to some league youtubers who had low-key censored league hentai for thumbs or showing in vids
5 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
If you are a parent that thinks YouTube should be a completely safe place for your child, or rather there shouldn’t be any videos that may not be safe for them, then you should monitor them because others enjoy that content. Content is subjective and nobody should receive strikes
1 reply 0 retweets 49 likes -
Youtube is making the website kid-friendly, TV-alike and safe to be watched by everyone whether you like it or not
9 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Also no - I don’t think strikes are the right thing to do, I think youtube should have a better warning system or just age-restrict these videos
10 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
The problem is age restriction causes for money loss and view loss in YouTube’s broken system. Kid friendly doesn’t mean all content should be censored for kids. That’s legit a loss of freedom of speech and expression. You cannot make something kid friendly just because.
1 reply 0 retweets 23 likes
There is literally a parental lock on YouTube which stops a child from watching all age restricted videos. No need for strikes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.