Alogs can't be used to "falsely register accounts ... or falsely likes, comment, forwards... manipulate search rankings, control hot topics, ... implement self-preferential treatment, unfair competition, influence online public opinion, or evade supervision." 7/
-
Show this thread
-
Protecting kids: Algorithms cannot push info to minors that induce them to imitate unsafe behaviors or bad habits, or profile them in order to encourage internet addiction. 8/
2 replies 5 retweets 61 likesShow this thread -
No brutal work conditions for ride-hailing drivers, delivery drivers: "Algos that provide scheduling services to workers shall improve ... platform order distribution, remuneration, working hours, rewards and punishments, [to] protect workers' rights and interests." 9/
5 replies 11 retweets 73 likesShow this thread -
No using algorithms for differential treatment: "providers shall not use algorithms to implement unreasonable trading conditions such as differential treatment and transaction prices based on consumer preferences and transaction habits and other illegal acts." 10/
1 reply 7 retweets 58 likesShow this thread -
The Party does not want algorithms running amok and influencing public opinion. The CAC will keep records of algos that have "public opinion attributes or social mobilization capabilities," and algos which have such attributes must register. 11/
2 replies 10 retweets 55 likesShow this thread -
CAC will also conduct security and safety inspections of recommendation algorithm providers. Algo providers must also set up channels to receive, and respond to, complaints from the public. 12/
3 replies 1 retweet 43 likesShow this thread -
Buuuttttt... fines for violations are pretty low. First penalty is a warning. If the violation is serious, max fine is RMB 30,000 (around USD 5,000). This is likely because they need to be payable by small app developers, not just big tech. 13/
2 replies 2 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
That said, if a criminal act has taken place (say, a violation of the upcoming Personal Information Protection Law), then fines could be huge. 14/
1 reply 2 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
As far as I'm concerned, this policy marks the moment that China's tech regulation is not simply keeping pace with data regulations in the EU, but has gone beyond them. 15/
9 replies 39 retweets 168 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @kendraschaefer
This is massive. Excuse my naivety, but will it be possible for bigger companies to bribe their way around this
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'll go out on a limb here and say: not in China's current regulatory environment, no. There's a massive push to reign in the behavior of tech platforms that comes straight from China's top leadership.
-
-
Replying to @kendraschaefer
That's great news! I'm still beside myself at how comprehensive & sensible it seems. I'd expect something like this out of a place like Finland maybe (afaik they're leading the world in digital medical record policy)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.