Kendra Schaefer 凯娜

I finally had time to sit down and read this very long recent essay by Lin Junyue, often called the "Father of China's Social Credit System." In it, he outlines the biggest problems with China's SCS today. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI3ODM1MzI3NA==&mid=2247505090&idx=1&sn=3a2f77da5f3cd0f3c2569dfe82815156&chksm=eb5ad0d7dc2d59c1e4b4e9ab08de7c6e127b4da5dc5b1b39ef2dbeae6195e86cdac73be71fb6&mpshare=1&scene=1&srcid=0914Fl5QPhqm2CtyWQo2EOa6&sharer_sharetime=1605762808203&sharer_shareid=fd85dcda3230db6e5236fe000328aeb9&exportkey=AfpmKEgOykmzdqSrF3Tt0sM%3D&pass_ticket=KORfiviO31yIuCzKQ31nUQHX2ilcNdiQAutYi0EP2Lg8o1lBcz%2BoYVi8DMrnchOK&wx_header=0#rd …

The essay (and his previous work) segments national credit systems into two types: market-led systems, and government-led systems. Lin has always seen the US (financial) credit system and China's social credit system as being predicated on the same basic set of principles:

As individuals and companies buy, borrow, transact, live, work, and play, data is collected. That data is then processed and used to make risk assessments. The difference in market-driven systems vs. gov-driven systems is what kind of data is collected, and what it is used for.

In a market-driven system, the data that is collected is usually financial, like loan repayment data. That's because this is the kind of data market entities have access to. In a gov-driven credit system, legal and admin data is used, because that's what governments have.

Lin worries that neither model is quite right for China, and both have obvious defects. He also thinks China has focused too much on the government model in the last 5 years.