"Senate Intelligence Committee Democrats Dispute Claims That Russia Probe Found No Collusion"https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/02/senate-intelligence-committee-democrats-dispute-claims-russia-probe-found-no-collusion/ …
-
-
Your story was reckless. And without context. I’m disappointed.
-
it had a whole lot of context. your disappointment is pointless.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Burr was a close Trump campaign national security adviser. He's been carried into appearing non-partisan in the investigation by
@MarkWarner But now we're in crunch time.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Umm your reporting is based in a fantasy world that Putin and Trump would have executed a written agreement and that the paltry investigation the GOP have conducted would have discovered it. However, you do you Ken.
-
"paltry" you'd have to have some insider info to make that assessment. Besides, Mueller is running the show…
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You talked to aides based on a CBS story last week.
-
I read that CBS story more than once. Burr rambles and his claims are unclear. Today’s story doesn’t clarify any of that—therefore the confusion. It doesn’t appear definite at all. They’re not even finished! Why now? To confuse and cover!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm soooooo over you!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In other words, 'horrendous'.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.