This is effectively a Catmull-Clark subdivision (with some 3D version) to get the parametric domain followed by smaller-cube refinement, btw.
-
-
-
Right. Here's a picture of the subdivision
@amirvaxman_dgp is talking about, which can be used to trivially convert any tetrahedral mesh into a hexahedral mesh—but with poor angles near tet vertices. Any other way to split up a tet into cubes? :-)pic.twitter.com/W2aGRA691t
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nice ! But it is really a pity not to have access to some code to be able to reproduce yours results from Symmetric Moving Frames. Even Matlab code would be great. We are unable to benchmark with other methods.
-
Hi
@angelo93728560, we’d love to get some example code out. In the meantime you can compare against our results (and many more) at https://www.hexalab.net@ALoopingIcon - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I have to say that I love this discussion with 3D, drawings and topology
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It only works on things which are symmetric though?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.