i was a little surprised by the location of legumes. this chart digs a little deeper. via @JossFongpic.twitter.com/wyKY9TEVHD
Prikaži ovu nit
nice succinct metanalysis plotting how bad food is for your health vs the environment https://www.pnas.org/content/116/46/23357 …pic.twitter.com/wEbgEttwAL
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
thanks, this seems to be the main takeaway: VG/V are comparable and O is drastically worse.pic.twitter.com/nrDVfhAHQC
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
i note the log scale on the y axis. i wonder if that reflects a log bias in the “average relative environmental impact” or if processed red meat consumption is just, really bad
-
AREI is just an average across the indicators in the second chart i posted, where it turns out that yes, land use, acidification, etc is exponentially higher for red meat
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
they should have added drugs.
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Interesting! Not the most relevant part but: any idea why processed red meat has less environmental impact than unprocessed meat? Sound so counterintuitive...
-
The fun answer would be that processed meat can use more parts of the animal, can be of lower quality, and is cheaper to transport since it can be formed to a container. The less fun answer is that the paper says that a standard serving of processed meat is smaller.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Amazing chart! I'd love to see ethical variables taken into account as well like how much suffering/death is caused. Inspiration: https://reducing-suffering.org/how-much-direct-suffering-is-caused-by-various-animal-foods/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.