You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
All I can say is that after a year of watching and listening to criticism of Jim it was always a variant on not being a scientist and/or being a politician as being disqualifiers. Statements like "NASA has always been run by a scientist" abound.
Keith, the criticism was more questioning whether he accepted the scientific process and the results thereof, namely of climate change. That’s a fair criticism.
Ken go do a read through of the tweets that have been posted since last year about Bridenstine. They say what they say. We're all reading too much into them IMHO. As Lee said people outside our little news bubble tend to say what they think - and what they mean.
The Twitterverse is not a reflection of reality. It’s its own bubble — bigger, but even more distorted (by bots, among other things) than the news bubble.
I guess? That's certainly what most thoughtful critics were saying. Are those the only ones that matter, though? Because most of the stuff I've seen on social media was more in the rote vein of "he's not a scientist and he's a Republican/Trump appointee, so he's terrible."
It feels really disingenuous to me to basically say that all those "he's not a scientist" criticisms shouldn't be taken at face value when it's pretty clear (to me, anyway) that said critics meant them to be taken that way.
Yes exactly.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
